How We Rate Interac Casinos for Bank Fit

Everything on this list is ranked on bank fit. Not on visual design, not on the size of a headline percentage, and not on speed. Bank fit means one question asked four ways: how likely is it that money leaves your particular institution and arrives in this operator's account without a support ticket?

What we score

• How broad the cashier's institution coverage is. An operator that accepts a transfer from any participating institution serves a credit union member as well as it serves a big-five customer. One that quietly supports a handful of large banks does not.
• What a first attempt costs. The minimum qualifying deposit, because that is the price of finding out whether your own institution's transfer goes through. Across this lineup it runs from C$1 to C$45, and the low end is genuinely useful.
• Whether the operator documents its own e-Transfer handling. A cashier that names the product, states the minimum and explains the security-answer field is a cashier that has thought about Canadian payments. Silence on all three is its own answer.
• Terms published before you accept. Wagering multiples in particular. An operator that advertises a match and withholds the multiple is asking you to accept an offer you cannot price, and it loses position for it.
• Offers quoted as published. Real figures in the operator's own currency with the date we captured them. Two brands here publish in euros, and euros is how we show them.

What we do not score

• Payout speed. Untimed by us, therefore unranked by us. Where an operator publishes a processing window, it is that operator's stated policy and we attribute it.
• Deposit fees and send ceilings. Interac sets neither and refers users to their own institution for availability and policies. The figures that matter are in your own account agreement.
• Game counts. Easy to inflate, and unrelated to whether your bank can pay the site.

Where a rating comes from

The number beside each brand is an editorial judgement across those five criteria, not a measurement, and we label it that way deliberately. Where the evidence was missing, the page records the gap.

When we revisit

Published terms get re-read on a rolling basis and every figure is dated. The operator's own cashier is the authority in any disagreement, which means we are the ones who are wrong. Send corrections to [email protected].